Is Your HACCP Plan Keeping Up with Emerging Food Safety Risks?

Share:

Following global food safety incidents and risks is an important part of managing your risk profile and identifying potential new hazards to your food business. Reviewing your HACCP plan when new risks emerge is the next step to keeping your business safe.

When was your HACCP plan last updated because the risk environment changed, rather than simply because its annual review date arrived?

The Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) Food Safety Insights: Emerging Risks and Current Issues bulletin highlights the importance of monitoring international incidents, recalls and newly recognised hazards that may affect New Zealand food businesses.

A current example is Cereulide, a potent toxin produced by certain strains of Bacillus cereus. Cereulide was associated with international infant-nutrition recalls in early 2026, including a precautionary recall in New Zealand. Unlike the vegetative bacterium, the toxin is resistant to heat, meaning that a standard thermal process may not remove Cereulide once it has already formed.

This raises important HACCP questions:

  • Are emerging toxins considered in your hazard analysis?
  • Could the hazard enter through a minor ingredient or an overseas supplier?
  • Does supplier testing address the actual hazard, or only general microbial counts?
  • Does process validation consider spores and preformed toxins – not just vegetative cells?
  • Would your traceability system identify every product containing an affected ingredient?

The incident also demonstrates why businesses should not rely exclusively on finished-product testing.

HACCP verification should use a combination of:

  • Supplier assurance and ingredient-risk assessments;
  • Environmental and product monitoring;
  • Regulatory alerts and international recall information;
  • Complaince and non-conformance trends;
  • Targeted surveillance testing; and
  • Documented reassessment when new information becomes available.

The MPI 2024–2025 Food Residues Survey Programme provides another example. The programme collected 300 plant-based food samples and tested them for more than 500 agricultural chemical compounds. MPI assessed the non-compliant findings and determined that they did not present a food-safety risk.

The lesson is not that every emerging issue must become a Critical Control Point (CCP).

The lesson is that every credible new hazard or surveillance finding should be assessed for relevance to your:

Ingredients → Suppliers → Process → Product → Consumers → Markets

Your HACCP plan should be a living risk-management system – not a document reviewed once a year and returned to the shelf.

Produco can assist with:

  • Emerging-risk and regulatory horizon reviews
  • HACCP reassessment and hazard-analysis workshops
  • Supplier and raw-material risk reviews
  • Monitoring and surveillance-testing plans
  • Validation and verification reviews and
  • Mock incident and traceability exercises.

Is your HACCP system designed to identify tomorrow’s hazard— or only manage yesterdays risks?